I hope that we can all agree that Nazi Germany was a racist state. However, contrary to what many people still believe, Nazi antisemitism was not based on biological "race" e.g. see The Concept "Jew" in Nazi "Race" Legislation. Use your back button to return to this page.
According to paragraph 1 of the scheme of its schedule, IHCS scholarships are to assist in training for the ministry of the Church of England students (i.e. Anglican Christians), "who shall at some pervious time have professed any form of the Jewish faith or either of whose parents shall at some time have professed any form of that faith".
So in the same way that, for example, in the Third Reich a German Christian with no personal knowledge of a Jewish past, but whose grandparents happened to have been members of the Jewish religious community was designated a "racial Jew" by Nazi law, an Anglican Christian is designated a "Hebrew Christian" (i.e. a Christian of the "Jewish race") by the IHCS's rules on the same grounds. The difference between a parent who "professed a form of the Jewish faith" and one that was a member of "the Jewish religious community" is no more than semantics.
By the foregoing it is not the intention to suggest that the IHCS is Nazi or that its supporters have Nazi sympathies. The only point that I wish to make is that the Anglican IHCS is practising racial discrimination against fellow Anglicans in the selection of those to whom it grants financial support.
I am not at all sure whether its various administrators fully appreciate
the true nature of the IHCS. Surely, however, they must sometimes wonder
why they are doling out money to someone on the basis of his or her parent's
religion, or even former religion? This must seem especially strange considering
that the IHCS, the beneficiary and the IHCS's Advisory Committee are all
solidly Anglican, whist the religion on which the discrimination is based
is Judaism. Surely, it is not the usual practice for Anglicans to discriminate
against fellow Anglicans on the basis of their former faith? The question
is whether the IHCS's various administrators can claim a defence of ignorance
regarding this charity's racial discrimination, even in the face of some
question-provoking evidence that something is definitely not in order?