You Too Can be a Victim of Racial Discrimination

It is common place these days for Christians to express sympathy for the victims of racial discrimination. Few Christians, however, actually have the chance to share the victim's experience. So here is your chance to experience the humiliating frustration of racial discrimination firsthand.

Are you what in common parlance might be called a "non-Jewish Christian"? If so you are eligible for this exercise. To avoid needless complications you are only eligible if you are a "non-Jewish Christian" NOT married to a "Christian Jew" (often styled as a "Hebrew Christian" or "Messianic Jew").

Having overcome this first hurdle, you must now complete and return an application form for membership of the "International Messianic Jewish Alliance" (1). Apply to Revd. Ronald Lewis, the IMJA's Executive Secretary at, "Shalom", Brockenhurst Rd., RAMSGATE, Kent, CT11 8ED, England. Alternatively, you could e-mail the IMJA on imja@jfjuk.ftech.org

To ensure that you are a Christian you will be asked to affirm that you:

Section III, paragraph 3 of the IMJA's Constitution.

Having passed this test of your Christian commitment you will however be refused full membership of the IMJA on racial grounds under s.III, paragraph 2 of its current Constitution. The IMJA is "united in Christ" but divided by "race" and although you are a fellow Christian, you are not a "Christian Jew" as defined by the IMJA's constitution. You will be a victim of racial discrimination.

In accordance with section III, paragraphs 2 & 5 of its current Constitution the IMJA on racial grounds:

What can be done now?

The sting in the tail concerns what to do once you have become a victim. Do you just sit and feel sorry for yourself or will you act? Let us briefly look at a few of your options.

Is it lawful?

It is not clear whether the IMJA's racial discrimination is lawful under the Race Relations Act 1976. This can only be tested if a "non-Jewish Christian" applies for membership and is refused (i.e. is offered associate instead of full membership). If you found yourself in this position you might take action against the IMJA under section 25 of the 1976 Act. Confirm this by writing to the Commision for Racial Equality (Elliot House, 10/12 Allington St., LONDON SW1E 5EH). The CRE might even support you in a legal action against the IMJA.

Raise the question with your church

You could raise the fruits of your experience at the hands of a supposedly Christian association with your own Church. For example, does your Church participate in an anti-racism group like the Joint Christian Group on Race Relations (JCGRR)? Here are some of its members: Urge your Church to support action against all racial discrimination and not be selective. To concern itself only with anti-"black" racism whilst ignoring a racist association like the IMJA in its own midst gives the false impression that the Church's anti-racism amounts to little more than an exercise in cosmetic political correctness. What chance of success do you think you have anyway if the Church appears to endorse racial discrimination? Direct racial discrimination is never justified.

Complain to the specifically Christian anti-racist groups.

You could urge Christian anti-racist groups like the Evangelical Christians for Racial Justice (269 Rotton Park Rd., BIRMINGHAM B16 0LD) to expand its remit beyond an exclusive concern for anti-"black" racism. For example, I have a copy of a letter dated 22 12 1995 sent to the IMJA by the ECRJ along with a copy of the ECRJ Manifesto. Probable the most telling sentence in the letter reads,

"It is with sorrow that we acknowledge that many of our fellow Christians are not fully aware of the ramifications of 'racism', and some indeed, are complicit with it."

I take this to be a guarded criticism of the IMJA. The ECRJ also admitted its incompetence to deal with the issues raised because its concerns "... have been almost exclusively with black citizens of this country, many of them Christians".

My impression is that the ECRJ knows full well that the IMJA is un-Christian, un-Jewish and racist. With urging from you the ECRJ might go further than just expressing its concern in highly diplomatic language.

Does an ordained minister of your denomination hold a post in the IMJA secured by racial discrimination?

Check if an ordained minister of your denomination benefits from the IMJA's racial discrimination. For example, Mr. Ronald Lewis is both the IMJA's Executive Secretary and an ordained minister of the United Reform Church. Ironically, the URC is also a participating member of the JCGRR. So whilst the URC participates in the JCGRR's worthy cause of anti-racism one of its own ministers holds an executive post in the IMJA secured in substantial part by racial discrimination. No one is claiming that the URC is responsible for the IMJA but surely it is responsible for the activities of one of its own ordained ministers?,

The Church of England's Board for Social Responsibility and the Church Army are also members of the JCGRR. Revd. John Fieldsend is an Associate Editor of the IMJA's magazine, "The Messianic Jew (and Hebrew Christian)". He is also a minister of the Church of England and a missionary for the Church's Ministry Among the Jews (a mission to the Jews with strong Anglican associations). Again no one suggests that the Church of England is responsible for the IMJA but is it also not responsible for the activities of its own ministers? It seems to be fast enough to come forward if a minister is involved in sexual impropriety, for example, so why not when the cause for moral concern is racial discrimination?

References

  1. The "International Messianic Jewish Alliance"
Use your back button to return to this page.

Back to:

This page (including its HTML source) is copyright of the author.